Expert Analysis: Glinka vs Makk Tennis Match
Daniil Glinka and Peter Makk are set to face off in a compelling tennis match on November 4, 2025, at 18:00. This analysis will delve into various betting predictions, offering insights based on the latest data.
Glinka, Daniil
Makk, Peter
(FT)
Predictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 1st Set Games | 60.70% | (2-0) 6-2 1st Set 2.00 | |
| Under 2.5 Sets | 73.90% | (2-0) | |
| Under 1st Set Games | 73.20% | (2-0) 6-2 1st Set 1.25 | |
| Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 71.10% | (2-0) | |
| Tie Break in Match (No) | 72.50% | (2-0) | |
| Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) | 55.90% | (2-0) | |
| Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) | 59.70% | (2-0) |
Over 1st Set Games: 57.20
This prediction suggests that the first set is likely to have more than 7 games. Both players are known for their competitive play, which often leads to longer sets. Glinka’s aggressive baseline play might push the game into extended rallies, while Makk’s defensive skills could prolong the set further.
Under 2.5 Sets: 75.00
There is a strong probability that the match will be decided in fewer than 2.5 sets. Given both players’ physical endurance and tactical acumen, they might aim to secure an early advantage, potentially leading to a swift conclusion.
Under 1st Set Games: 73.50
This indicates a likelihood that the first set will have fewer than 7 games. Both Glinka and Makk have shown the ability to capitalize on early opportunities, which could lead to a quick finish in the first set.
Tie Break in 1st Set (No): 74.30
The odds suggest that the first set will not go to a tiebreak. Both players have demonstrated proficiency in closing out sets without needing a tiebreak, possibly due to their strategic approaches and mental toughness.
Tie Break in Match (No): 71.20
This prediction implies that the match will likely be decided without a tiebreak in any of the sets. Given their experience and tactical play, both players might avoid tiebreaks by leveraging their strengths effectively throughout the match.
Total Games 3-Way (Under 22): 55.50
This suggests that the total number of games played across all sets will be under 22. Both players’ ability to maintain focus and execute their game plans efficiently could result in a match with fewer games.
Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5): 56.00
The likelihood of the match having fewer than 22.5 games indicates a potential for a brisk encounter. Their competitive edge and strategic gameplay might lead to a decisive outcome without extending into many games.